Compare PricesHardware, RAM, Memory, Motherboards, ProcessorsSoftware, ProgramsGaming, Games, Consoles
DWPG.Com - Corsair Hydrocool 200   
 
 Navigation
  Home
  Articles
  Tutorials
  Reviews
  Industry news
  Forums
  About us
  Submit news
  Downloads
  Disclaimer
  User articles
web design vancouver
 Review, Corsair Hydrocool 200 Watercooler
Testbench and benchmarks
By: Sverre Sjøthun, May 22, 2003  Print this article

o

The testbench:
- Lian Li PC75 USB
- Asus P4G8X
- 2x256MB Corsair TWINX 3200
- Intel Pentium 4 3.06
- Sapphire Radeon 9500 128

The testbench

The testbench


Testing methology
We ran a set of SiSoft Sandra Burn-in wizards, ten loops after having used the setup for three days (to make sure the thermal paste had "settled"). The looping was performed three times and the highest temperature was registered as result. The idle temperature was measured in the morning after, before any work was done. Ambient temperature fluctuation was +/- 0.2 degrees. The same procedure was performed after overclocking to 3450MHz.

Results

P4 3.06GHz at default speed

P4 3.06GHz at default speed


As we expected, the Hydrocool ended up below our other watercooling systems because the AC and Magnum waterblocks were tested using a much bigger and more efficient radiator, pump and so on. Despite this, the Hydrocool performed very well - the DeltaT between idle and full load is only 3.5 degrees. But what happens when we increase the load on the cooler?

Overclocked, P4 3.06 running at 3450 MHz

Overclocked, P4 3.06 running at 3450 MHz


Overclocked to 3450MHz, the idle temperature increased by 7 degrees and the load temperature by 5.5 degrees, ie. a DeltaT of 2 degrees between idle and load.

Turbo mode
The performance in turbo mode didn't improve the performance much -- 0.5 to 1 degree cooler, so there's really no reason why one would want to run the fan at full throttle as the noise level tends to be a bit annoying.

After the testing, I disassembled the kit. What we found was quite disturbing -- the processor made very poor contact with the waterblock, and the reason? The waterblock is concave, making the contact-area between the two surfaces shrink to only a fraction of what it should be.

Poor contact with the processor, the waterblock base is concave

Poor contact with the processor, the waterblock base is concave



No wonder the Hydrocool 200 doesn't cool as well as expected with that poor contact between the processor and waterblock. As usual, we used a very thin layer of thermal paste, and we always clean off the processor before mounting any new cooling equipment. The image above speaks for itself -- only the edges of the processor had made contact with the waterblock, and we have verified that it is the waterblock, not the processor that is concave.

 Search for prices:  

  Introduction
  Specifications
  The construction in detail
  Mounting the kit
  Pre-testing
  Using the cooler
  Testbench and benchmarks
  Conclusion


ZIRE 71 PDA
Palm Computing
 Compare Prices

SS51G ATX Tower
Shuttle
 Compare Prices

256MB Secure Digital Card
SanDisk
 Compare Prices

RADEON 9800 Pro 128MB DDR
ATI
 Compare Prices
 Featured article


 Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter featuring site news, articles, reviews, latest press releases and more!

Please enter your email adress below and click Subscribe:



All documents and graphics published on this site are copyright © 1999 - 2019, DWPG.Com.  All rights reserved.
Web design, Search engine optimization and development by Sverre Sjøthun and Sigbjørn Lie, Nixtra.com.

DWPG.Com Sitemap